As mentioned on an earlier post, Avatar: the Last Airbender is pure genius and amazing. But, it's not just a show to watch: there are some valuable life lessons that we as a society and as individuals can take away from this show. Every character, every action, every event- they all teach us something. Therefore, I will be writing about each of the main characters, and what we can learn from each of them.
Katara
Katara taught me to never stop fighting for those you love. She taught me to stand up for what's right, and challenge what's wrong. The waterbender also taught us to show compassion and protect your loved ones. Finally, Katara taught us that even though forgiveness isn't easy, it is always possible.
Toph
There is much to be said about this blind earthbender. She's sassy, independent, aggressive, assertive, stubborn, and comes with a smart mouth and plenty of attitude. She taught audiences to march to the beat of their own drum and that what may seem like a disability can actually be an advantage. She taught us that the path least taken is sometimes the best path to take.
Sokka
As the show's premier non-bender, Sokka certainly has to have something else to bring to the table, or he wouldn't have been such a central character. To make up for his 'normalness', Sokka is the "meat and sarcasm guy", but above that, he is the creative fuel behind Team Avatar. With a quick mind and boundless creative energy, Sokka taught me that there is more than one way to be 'special'. He also taught me that sometimes all you need in times of trouble is a good laugh, and that there is no wrong way to do something.
Iroh
What didn't Iroh teach us? As the most wise, philosophical, and reflective character, he certainly had a lot of memorable quotes and valuable lessons to teach. Above all else, Iroh taught us to never give up on somebody if they have lost their way: that a supportive, protective friend and guidance can save even the most helpless of souls.
He also taught us that everyone deserves a second chance, and that there is always something beautiful to be seen in life.
Zuko
Zuko is Avatar the Last Airbender's most complex character. You can expect a post just on him later, but for right now, Zuko also taught us many important lessons. For one, he taught us to never give up on your goal or accept failure- to just keep trying and moving forward no matter how slim the chances of success are. He also taught us to face life head-on, accept, and play with the hand you're dealt. Keep marching on and take whatever life throws at you and overcome it. Overcome the struggle, and you will be stronger. Zuko taught us that our struggles and mistakes don't define us, but, instead, it is how we change and react to such things that defines us. Our pasts don't define us, only our actions right now do.
Azula
It may seem that as the show's main antagonist, Azula can't really teach us anything good. However, we can learn from her mistakes: that cold hearted violence is never the right path, and that too much power will only lead to your demise.
Aang
Aang taught me that there is always a better solution and that life is the ultimate gift. Instead of violence and war, Aang taught us to embrace love, peace, and understanding. He also taught us to never give up on a friend and to always approach life with a positive attitude.
In conclusion, there is much to be learned from such well-developed and fleshed-out characters- lessons that everyone in society needs to learn.
Sunday, April 17, 2016
Sunday, April 10, 2016
Light or Dark?
Is cartoon violence o.k? Should we expose our kids to dark and controversial animated movies? What about race and gender representation? What about religion or drugs? Should animated movies and shows that will include such elements be made in the first place? Should children be shielded?
However, while this negativity towards other races isn't the best thing to expose young, easily-manipulated children, it won't give them nightmares and very well might soar over their heads. Children not understanding is also the big reason why innuendos are able to be included in kid's shows and movies without repercussion. They simply don't understand what is going on, and will forget the scene ever took place. But, full-on, exposed nudity shouldn't ever be in a kid's show or movie.
Potentially dirty language is also fairly safe for most kids. Many parents or siblings regularly swear at home, and when out in public, children are exposed to all sorts of vulgarity. As long as the parents teach them not to use the words, swearing is fine at small levels.
Religion is a touchy subject for many and should be up to the parents to decide whether they find certain content offensive.
While it isn't uncommon to see characters smoking or drinking, or perhaps tripping out on something like berries (The Good Dinosaur), mushrooms (Cowboy Bebop), or cactus juice (Avatar the Last Airbender) , there should under no circumstances be any other form of drugs.
Dark moments can be hard to determine. The range of reactions kids will show to scary moments in movies and shows is wide and diverse. Some love it, others don't mind, and still others have nightmares for weeks after. Therefore, this is another topic that is up to the parent's decision. If they know their kid is easily frightened, then I would say no to such content. But, for just about everyone else, dark and scary moments don't create any reason for concern.
Finally, similarly to dark moments, exposure to violence and blood in kid's shows and movies depends on the kid. I was personally never bothered by blood (except for Watership Down- which, despite being an animated movie about bunnies- IS NOT A KID'S MOVIE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES!!!), so I didn't mind if the shows or movies had blood. At least, not a lot for younger kids. A simple nosebleed or scratch is fine. Violence in kid's movies and shows is something that I believe 99% of kids are ok viewing. Considering most animated violence is unrealistic and, well, cartoony, it's hard for kids to find it disturbing or scary, or 'copy' the characters. Even content that has more realistic fighting is not bad for kids to view.
In conclusion, most of the controversial moments in animation are just that, controversial, and while I personally believe most kids are fine being exposed to most controversial content, it is still up to the parent's discretion.
The controversy over what is o.k to show in animation is a real topic. Some parents are concerned for what their kids are exposed to, others don't care at all. The real question comes down to whether it is better to keep them shielded from such things until they are older or rip off the band-aid and let them be exposed to the realities of life from the get-go. My personal opinion is to allow children exposure to certain elements, but forbid others.
There are a plethora of animated features that include the elements I have listed as potentially controversial, many of them considered perfectly safe for younger audiences. This is especially true with the aspect of gender and race representation in Disney films and other animated content. Myriad classic Disney films and older shows and movies, such as Looney Tunes, show complete disregard for politically correct representation of races that aren't white, employing methods such as Blackface and the stereotypical stupid and slow mentality to any African American characters. Such examples include the crows in Dumbo, one of whom is even named Jim Crow, and the orangutans in The Jungle Book, who want to 'be like you' and appear less civilized. Despite incredible bounds forward in this regard with the introduction of the first black princess, Tiana, from The Princess and the Frog, Disney films shows this misrepresentation; an upcoming Disney princess film entitled Princess of North Sudan, the first African princess, will be about a white colonist.
This race issue also extends into other minorities, most notably Native Americans and the Asian races. For instance, two movies, The Aristocats and Lady and the Tramp, include racist scenes of Siamese cats. And, in potentially the most racist Disney movie to date, Native Americans are presented in one of the most offensive manners possible, in Peter Pan.
However, while this negativity towards other races isn't the best thing to expose young, easily-manipulated children, it won't give them nightmares and very well might soar over their heads. Children not understanding is also the big reason why innuendos are able to be included in kid's shows and movies without repercussion. They simply don't understand what is going on, and will forget the scene ever took place. But, full-on, exposed nudity shouldn't ever be in a kid's show or movie.
Potentially dirty language is also fairly safe for most kids. Many parents or siblings regularly swear at home, and when out in public, children are exposed to all sorts of vulgarity. As long as the parents teach them not to use the words, swearing is fine at small levels.
Religion is a touchy subject for many and should be up to the parents to decide whether they find certain content offensive.
While it isn't uncommon to see characters smoking or drinking, or perhaps tripping out on something like berries (The Good Dinosaur), mushrooms (Cowboy Bebop), or cactus juice (Avatar the Last Airbender) , there should under no circumstances be any other form of drugs.
Dark moments can be hard to determine. The range of reactions kids will show to scary moments in movies and shows is wide and diverse. Some love it, others don't mind, and still others have nightmares for weeks after. Therefore, this is another topic that is up to the parent's decision. If they know their kid is easily frightened, then I would say no to such content. But, for just about everyone else, dark and scary moments don't create any reason for concern.
Finally, similarly to dark moments, exposure to violence and blood in kid's shows and movies depends on the kid. I was personally never bothered by blood (except for Watership Down- which, despite being an animated movie about bunnies- IS NOT A KID'S MOVIE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES!!!), so I didn't mind if the shows or movies had blood. At least, not a lot for younger kids. A simple nosebleed or scratch is fine. Violence in kid's movies and shows is something that I believe 99% of kids are ok viewing. Considering most animated violence is unrealistic and, well, cartoony, it's hard for kids to find it disturbing or scary, or 'copy' the characters. Even content that has more realistic fighting is not bad for kids to view.
In conclusion, most of the controversial moments in animation are just that, controversial, and while I personally believe most kids are fine being exposed to most controversial content, it is still up to the parent's discretion.
Is Avatar an anime?
an·i·me
ˈanəˌmā/
noun
- a style of Japanese film and television animation, typically aimed at adults as well as children.
There is a popular controversy amongst fans of Avatar the Last Airbender over whether the show is an anime. Going by the above defintion, it falls right on the line between Western animation and anime. The show was produced in the United States, not Japan, but the style and certain elements of the show are distinctivly anime qualities.
According to the definition, a show has to be made in Japan or by a Japanese company in order to be considered anime. However, many shows use anime influences, or certain anime use Western influences. For example, Teen Titans is a very anime-esque show, and Cowboy Bebop feels American-made. Some anime even have their biggest following and have entered mainstream culture in America, such as Naruto, Pokemon, and Dragon Ball Z. Still, to be an anime, the show has to have originated from Japan in some way. Therefore, Avatar, which didn't even get released in Japan or have a Japanese dub, can't be anime.
But, Avatar includes more anime sterotypes and influences then some anime do themselves (like Cowboy Bebop). Many anime were used as references or directly influenced the creation and production of Avatar the Last Airbender. Some of these used were the Miyzaki films, and Cowboy Bebop itself. The characters are drawn and animated like anime characters, and have the same kind of development and complexity (not to say cartoon characters can't be complex, just that the way the characters are handled is more similar to anime). Many of the formal nouns (locations, names, etc) are Japanese (almost all are Chinese, but that's besides the point) and the entirity of the show is based on Asian culture (which again, mainly includes China, but there are Japanese influences). There are even a very small number of fully European or white characters. The rest are either Native American or Asian in ethnicity. The story, art style, and characterization is almost exactly as you would find it in an anime.
Also to take into consideration is that anime isn't a genre: it's a style or medium. We don't say cartoons are a genre: we say fantasy or adventure is a genre. Therefore, there can be overlap as styles draw on each other and as shows aren't confined to a singular medium.
Still, thanks to it originating in America from an American studio, Avatar the Last Airbender has to be a cartoon, but it serves as a bridge to anime for American audiences and has a memorable 'feel' to it- the same feel that exists for all cartoons that draw from anime.
As Iroh once said "It is important to draw wisdom from many different places."
Animation: Not Just for Kids
There is a negative stigma in American culture: that only children can enjoy animated movies and shows. This is evident in the large number of light-hearted, G-rated kid’s movies or cartoons, and what the perceived demographic and targeted audience of animated content. However, adults can enjoy and shouldn’t be ashamed of animation; animation is not just for kids.
In other cultures, this stigma about animation is less prevalent and in some cases, nonexistent. For example, Japanese culture is much less convinced that only kids will watch cartoons, seen in the ridiculously wide variety and number of anime, or the Japanese equivalent of cartoons. There are even specific categories of anime, sorted by their intended audience. One such category, and perhaps the most popular, is shounen, or programming aimed at pre-teen boys. While this branch of anime is aimed at children, there is a large fanbase of adults, who are seen fawning over the show; dressing up and showing their obsession at various conventions. These conventions also exist for cartoons, and some of the more popular animated shows and movies enjoy large and diverse audiences.
Besides, most animated movies and some shows receive high critical praise ; placing at the top of ratings lists and opening to high box office yields. In fact, some of the world’s highest grossing films are animated. And for good reason, too. Animated films and shows have their own awards show, the Annies, and their own category at the Oscars. Many animated films have also been nominated or received awards normally given to live-action features. Two films, UP and Beauty and the Beast, have even been nominated for the best picture Oscar.
Animated films and shows don’t just look good in numbers or on paper; they are also, in my opinion, some of the most original and creative films and shows out there. Some things just don’t translate to live action. The best example I can think of is Avatar the Last Airbender. Originating as a tv series that was and continues to be highly praised and received, a live action movie was made, hoping to ride on the success of the show. However, the film was a complete failure, with low ratings and box office reception. Where the show was complex and well-animated, the movie was awkward and had bad effects.
The effects of movies and films are also an area where animation reigns supreme. Live action is limited by current technology, and in many cases, requires animation for certain special effects, such as Rocket Racoon from Guardians of the Galaxy. On the other hand, anything that the animator or creator wants can be seen. Any crazy body shape, or reality warp, or made-up land or creature can come to life within animation. This lends to more diverse and unique movies and shows that show more creative capacity and imaginativeness.
I do understand where those of you that feel the opposite come from; you feel that you shouldn’t be watching animation because it isn’t ‘mature’ or ‘appropriate’ for your age. To this, I say expand the repertoire of movies you have seen Yes, I won’t deny that there are some animated movies and shows that are frankly idiotic and childish, but if you look beyond those, you will find a genre that is respectable and beautiful. For every Ice Age sequel there is a How to Train Your Dragon. For every Spongebob there is a Gravity Falls. You may refuse to see it, but live action and adult swim shows follow this same trend.
Finally, animated shows and movies are good for adults because of the nostalgia they bring. There is nothing more joyful than revisiting your forgotten childhood friends. You still remember them- because they are designed to be memorable, likable, and full of heart. In fact, if there is any quality that all good animated programming has, its heart. You are a liar if you say you didn’t cry for Simba during The Lion King, or at the beginning of UP. You felt yourself connect to those characters.
Therefore, if you are still convinced that animation can’t be enjoyed by adults, then I invite you to pop in one of your old Disney VHS tapes (admit it- you have the entire collection) and revisit your ‘younger self’.
In other cultures, this stigma about animation is less prevalent and in some cases, nonexistent. For example, Japanese culture is much less convinced that only kids will watch cartoons, seen in the ridiculously wide variety and number of anime, or the Japanese equivalent of cartoons. There are even specific categories of anime, sorted by their intended audience. One such category, and perhaps the most popular, is shounen, or programming aimed at pre-teen boys. While this branch of anime is aimed at children, there is a large fanbase of adults, who are seen fawning over the show; dressing up and showing their obsession at various conventions. These conventions also exist for cartoons, and some of the more popular animated shows and movies enjoy large and diverse audiences.
Besides, most animated movies and some shows receive high critical praise ; placing at the top of ratings lists and opening to high box office yields. In fact, some of the world’s highest grossing films are animated. And for good reason, too. Animated films and shows have their own awards show, the Annies, and their own category at the Oscars. Many animated films have also been nominated or received awards normally given to live-action features. Two films, UP and Beauty and the Beast, have even been nominated for the best picture Oscar.
Animated films and shows don’t just look good in numbers or on paper; they are also, in my opinion, some of the most original and creative films and shows out there. Some things just don’t translate to live action. The best example I can think of is Avatar the Last Airbender. Originating as a tv series that was and continues to be highly praised and received, a live action movie was made, hoping to ride on the success of the show. However, the film was a complete failure, with low ratings and box office reception. Where the show was complex and well-animated, the movie was awkward and had bad effects.
The effects of movies and films are also an area where animation reigns supreme. Live action is limited by current technology, and in many cases, requires animation for certain special effects, such as Rocket Racoon from Guardians of the Galaxy. On the other hand, anything that the animator or creator wants can be seen. Any crazy body shape, or reality warp, or made-up land or creature can come to life within animation. This lends to more diverse and unique movies and shows that show more creative capacity and imaginativeness.
I do understand where those of you that feel the opposite come from; you feel that you shouldn’t be watching animation because it isn’t ‘mature’ or ‘appropriate’ for your age. To this, I say expand the repertoire of movies you have seen Yes, I won’t deny that there are some animated movies and shows that are frankly idiotic and childish, but if you look beyond those, you will find a genre that is respectable and beautiful. For every Ice Age sequel there is a How to Train Your Dragon. For every Spongebob there is a Gravity Falls. You may refuse to see it, but live action and adult swim shows follow this same trend.
Finally, animated shows and movies are good for adults because of the nostalgia they bring. There is nothing more joyful than revisiting your forgotten childhood friends. You still remember them- because they are designed to be memorable, likable, and full of heart. In fact, if there is any quality that all good animated programming has, its heart. You are a liar if you say you didn’t cry for Simba during The Lion King, or at the beginning of UP. You felt yourself connect to those characters.
Therefore, if you are still convinced that animation can’t be enjoyed by adults, then I invite you to pop in one of your old Disney VHS tapes (admit it- you have the entire collection) and revisit your ‘younger self’.
Sunday, April 3, 2016
Merchandise- Yes or No?
I know a lot of people get annoyed at merchandise, saying things like "there's too much" and "it's too expensive". I can be one of those people sometimes, especially when it comes to a franchise that is overrated. The best example I can think of is Frozen. Seriously, does anybody need an Elsa bra? (Look it up- it exists) Such merchandising also leads to cultural intrusion or problems with other vendors. Not everybody needs Frozen this and Frozen that- by buying them, you give Disney even more power to knock out smaller sellers and businesses or buy the entire company, leading to Disney continuing to monopolize the entire filmaking and toymaking industry.
Now while the merchandising might be awful for competition, it rakes in massive profits for Disney. I mean, they sold hundreds of thousands of Elsa dresses during Halloween. These profits then go towards supporting future company growth and movie production- which gives Disney more power to make another Frozen movie.
Merchandising also leads towards smaller companies, when they are bought by larger companies, to be forced into doing something they don't want to do. What I'm trying to get at is this: the only reason Cars 2 and soon to be Cars 3, which, at least the second, don't hold up to Pixar's standards, is because of merchandising. In fact, that is why a lot of Pixar's upcoming releases are sequels- Disney wants them to do more franchising. And a big part of franchising is merchandise.
So I do see why people are annoyed with merchandising, but I prefer the opposite standpoint- I personally like merchandise. I enjoy being able to continue my obssessions by buying things like clothing and Pillow Pets. It's not only Disney- I like being able to buy my Toothless and Barf and Belch Build-A-Bears and my Fullmetal Alchemist shirts. It helps define who I am and what I like, as well as help create more of a connection to the franchise. I probably wouldn't like Disney as much if I wasn't free to buy stuffed Dumbos or Cinderella dresses.
In conclusion, I support merchandising because it helps you create a connection with the franchise and supports the company.
Now while the merchandising might be awful for competition, it rakes in massive profits for Disney. I mean, they sold hundreds of thousands of Elsa dresses during Halloween. These profits then go towards supporting future company growth and movie production- which gives Disney more power to make another Frozen movie.
Merchandising also leads towards smaller companies, when they are bought by larger companies, to be forced into doing something they don't want to do. What I'm trying to get at is this: the only reason Cars 2 and soon to be Cars 3, which, at least the second, don't hold up to Pixar's standards, is because of merchandising. In fact, that is why a lot of Pixar's upcoming releases are sequels- Disney wants them to do more franchising. And a big part of franchising is merchandise.
So I do see why people are annoyed with merchandising, but I prefer the opposite standpoint- I personally like merchandise. I enjoy being able to continue my obssessions by buying things like clothing and Pillow Pets. It's not only Disney- I like being able to buy my Toothless and Barf and Belch Build-A-Bears and my Fullmetal Alchemist shirts. It helps define who I am and what I like, as well as help create more of a connection to the franchise. I probably wouldn't like Disney as much if I wasn't free to buy stuffed Dumbos or Cinderella dresses.
In conclusion, I support merchandising because it helps you create a connection with the franchise and supports the company.
AMV
AMV stands for animated music video, and those are short videos set to songs of clips/pictures from the franchise. These are made by fans, and many can be seen on Youtube.
These videos range greatly in quality, with some being barely passable and others winning awards at conventions and being acclaimed by the creators of the franchise.
I will likely do a later post on how to make your own AMV, but for this post I will be discussing some that have already been made, and the qualities that make an AMV good.
1. The song choice
The song that the video uses is a big part of an AMV. A good AMV will use a song that fits with the movie/show, either in style or lyrics, sometimes both. If you can picture the franchise while just listening to the song on its own, then it is a good song choice. There are a couple of songs that are used in AMVs a lot, no matter the franchise. These songs, which include "This is War" from Thirty Seconds to Mars, "Centuries" from Fall Out Boy, "Dance With the Devil" from Breaking Benjamin, and "Angel With a Shotgun" from Nightcore, among others, are amazing when done correctly. If not, they are even more susceptible to being mediocre, since the song is overrate. But, there is a reason everybody uses songs like these- they fit almost anything. In general, the best animated music videos have a unique song that fits the franchise.
2. Pacing
Pace is very important in AMVs, and depends on the song and the source material. For example, you wouldn't want a bunch of in-your-face short action clips for an emotional video designed to be sad, and you wouldn't want long clips for an action video. In general, good AMVs will pace with an element of the song, such as the bass or vocals.
3. Song/video harmony
Going hand in hand with pacing, there should be a clean mesh between the video and the song. with the clips matching the instrumentation or lyrics in meaning/content. The best of the best try to match up specific scenes with specific parts/words of the song. I have even seen a few where they try to make the characters appear like they are singing the song, see "Be Prepared" with Invader Zim to see what I am talking about.
4. Timing
The last element crucial to every AMV is timing. This is similar to 2 and 3, but extends further to include specific character movements or moments from the show and editing the video so they occur at the exact time of something in the song. For example, a gunshot happening at the exact same time as a huge downbeat. There are some really cool AMVs that take advantage of this, using a motif or an idea of something that occurs in the movie/show frequently and timing it to a vamping section of the music (see "Transmutayshun " and "Counting Stars").
AMVs will sometimes include quotes and special effects. These also depend on the content, and in general, are best used in moderation.
Another similar kind of video are tribute videos, which clip together many franchises to one studio or company, or just make a video to commemorate something. These are based more on the video, with the music being chosen to fit the video, rather then the video to fit the music. Like AMVs, these are either amazing or awful. Likewise, one of the videos on the list below is a tribute video.
Some videos that show these aforementioned qualities (aka in my opinion the best AMVs I have seen):
They come from all sorts of franchises
These videos range greatly in quality, with some being barely passable and others winning awards at conventions and being acclaimed by the creators of the franchise.
I will likely do a later post on how to make your own AMV, but for this post I will be discussing some that have already been made, and the qualities that make an AMV good.
1. The song choice
The song that the video uses is a big part of an AMV. A good AMV will use a song that fits with the movie/show, either in style or lyrics, sometimes both. If you can picture the franchise while just listening to the song on its own, then it is a good song choice. There are a couple of songs that are used in AMVs a lot, no matter the franchise. These songs, which include "This is War" from Thirty Seconds to Mars, "Centuries" from Fall Out Boy, "Dance With the Devil" from Breaking Benjamin, and "Angel With a Shotgun" from Nightcore, among others, are amazing when done correctly. If not, they are even more susceptible to being mediocre, since the song is overrate. But, there is a reason everybody uses songs like these- they fit almost anything. In general, the best animated music videos have a unique song that fits the franchise.
2. Pacing
Pace is very important in AMVs, and depends on the song and the source material. For example, you wouldn't want a bunch of in-your-face short action clips for an emotional video designed to be sad, and you wouldn't want long clips for an action video. In general, good AMVs will pace with an element of the song, such as the bass or vocals.
3. Song/video harmony
Going hand in hand with pacing, there should be a clean mesh between the video and the song. with the clips matching the instrumentation or lyrics in meaning/content. The best of the best try to match up specific scenes with specific parts/words of the song. I have even seen a few where they try to make the characters appear like they are singing the song, see "Be Prepared" with Invader Zim to see what I am talking about.
4. Timing
The last element crucial to every AMV is timing. This is similar to 2 and 3, but extends further to include specific character movements or moments from the show and editing the video so they occur at the exact time of something in the song. For example, a gunshot happening at the exact same time as a huge downbeat. There are some really cool AMVs that take advantage of this, using a motif or an idea of something that occurs in the movie/show frequently and timing it to a vamping section of the music (see "Transmutayshun " and "Counting Stars").
AMVs will sometimes include quotes and special effects. These also depend on the content, and in general, are best used in moderation.
Another similar kind of video are tribute videos, which clip together many franchises to one studio or company, or just make a video to commemorate something. These are based more on the video, with the music being chosen to fit the video, rather then the video to fit the music. Like AMVs, these are either amazing or awful. Likewise, one of the videos on the list below is a tribute video.
Some videos that show these aforementioned qualities (aka in my opinion the best AMVs I have seen):
They come from all sorts of franchises
"Transmutayshun"- Fullmetal Alchemist
"The Hero Tale of Hiccup"- How to Train Your Dragon
"Be Prepared"- Invader Zim
"Counting Stars"- Gravity Falls
"25 Years of Pixar Animation"- Pixar
Show Choir Nationals
I know I am not supposed to be blogging diary type posts, so this post will be more of a review/reflection then a recounting of everything we did. Anyway, the reason why I am prefacing this post with that statement is because my show choir that I play in the band for, Happiness, Inc., recently, as in like today, got back from Nashville, TN where we competed against the top groups in the nation, coming out in 6th and winning best tech crew. It was actually my second time at nationals, the first being when I was a freshman two years ago.
Even though there were no groups from Nashville, or to my knowledge, TN, it was still the perfect place to host such an event. All of the performances were in the Grand Ole Opry, which could not be a better choice for the performances. It is a gorgeous concert hall, with excellent acoustics and big-name celebrities, at least in the country music world. The seating is also great, with it seating over 3000 people and having an expansive balcony. All in all the perfect performance venue for show choir.
The hotel, Gaylord Opryland, was similarly amazing and memorable, with just the size and amount of activities to do for a bunch of high-energy teenagers. It is about the size of the Mall of America, but without a giant roller coaster in the middle to help you navigate. Instead, it is split into four sections: Magnolia, Delta, Garden, and Cascades, each of which contains a major feature of the hotel: the shopping/restaurants, a river, the indoor garden, and waterfalls respectively. We stayed in the Garden freshman year, and this year in the Delta. I personally like the Cascades. The hotel as a whole is unbelievable and your entire vacation could be spent in the hotel and you wouldn't get bored. It's that big. I do have a couple complaints, though. First, the prices were way too high, but that's to be expected for a fancy hotel. Second, the rooms were rather small, but the rest of the hotel more than made up for the lack in the rooms. Finally, there were a bunch of other people that weren't very pleasant and talked behind our backs, but that's not under the hotel's control. Overall, the Gaylord Opryland Hotel was very memorable and easily the greatest hotel ever, at least of the ones that I have stayed at.
Opryland also includes a mall, known as the Opry Mills Mall, and is a large mall that includes an I-Max theater and sections based on what the shops are. Since I have been to Mall of America many times, I can't say it is the best mall ever, but it definitely tops any in Iowa.
We also attended the Wildhorse Saloon, which personally, I would find a lot more fun if I even in the slightest enjoyed dancing. Because I don't, and since I've already been there, I mostly just people watched, which is fun- its a bunch of hyped-up, showy teenagers. The food was great, though.
In terms of the actual competition, I found the results to be very fair. Of the shows that made it to finals, I agree with their placement, although I feel like some choirs need to be given a price limit. The winning group, who was from CA but I won't name because I can't spell the name to save my life, was the same group that won when we were there before. They did Edward Scissorhands before, and this time, a space-themed show. Yes, they were amazing, but the story was extremely difficult to follow.
What makes me the most excited and happy, however, is that show choirs mainly come from 3 places: the South, California, and the Midwest. California show choirs spend a ridiculous amount of money and are turning into Broadway productions, and the South is doing the same, but to a much less extent. The Midwest (this is the part I like), however, is the only place where show choir is still traditional and more focused on the singing and dancing, not the theme. In fact, many Midwestern shows don't even have a theme, and if they do, they don't use props and elaborate costumes. If they do, it's very minimal and is still balanced out by the rest of the show. Yes, there are a couple exceptions (I'm talking to you, Prairie), but for the most part, they are still down-to-earth classic show choir shows.
Overall, nationals were really fun and a memorable experience.
Even though there were no groups from Nashville, or to my knowledge, TN, it was still the perfect place to host such an event. All of the performances were in the Grand Ole Opry, which could not be a better choice for the performances. It is a gorgeous concert hall, with excellent acoustics and big-name celebrities, at least in the country music world. The seating is also great, with it seating over 3000 people and having an expansive balcony. All in all the perfect performance venue for show choir.
The hotel, Gaylord Opryland, was similarly amazing and memorable, with just the size and amount of activities to do for a bunch of high-energy teenagers. It is about the size of the Mall of America, but without a giant roller coaster in the middle to help you navigate. Instead, it is split into four sections: Magnolia, Delta, Garden, and Cascades, each of which contains a major feature of the hotel: the shopping/restaurants, a river, the indoor garden, and waterfalls respectively. We stayed in the Garden freshman year, and this year in the Delta. I personally like the Cascades. The hotel as a whole is unbelievable and your entire vacation could be spent in the hotel and you wouldn't get bored. It's that big. I do have a couple complaints, though. First, the prices were way too high, but that's to be expected for a fancy hotel. Second, the rooms were rather small, but the rest of the hotel more than made up for the lack in the rooms. Finally, there were a bunch of other people that weren't very pleasant and talked behind our backs, but that's not under the hotel's control. Overall, the Gaylord Opryland Hotel was very memorable and easily the greatest hotel ever, at least of the ones that I have stayed at.
Opryland also includes a mall, known as the Opry Mills Mall, and is a large mall that includes an I-Max theater and sections based on what the shops are. Since I have been to Mall of America many times, I can't say it is the best mall ever, but it definitely tops any in Iowa.
We also attended the Wildhorse Saloon, which personally, I would find a lot more fun if I even in the slightest enjoyed dancing. Because I don't, and since I've already been there, I mostly just people watched, which is fun- its a bunch of hyped-up, showy teenagers. The food was great, though.
In terms of the actual competition, I found the results to be very fair. Of the shows that made it to finals, I agree with their placement, although I feel like some choirs need to be given a price limit. The winning group, who was from CA but I won't name because I can't spell the name to save my life, was the same group that won when we were there before. They did Edward Scissorhands before, and this time, a space-themed show. Yes, they were amazing, but the story was extremely difficult to follow.
What makes me the most excited and happy, however, is that show choirs mainly come from 3 places: the South, California, and the Midwest. California show choirs spend a ridiculous amount of money and are turning into Broadway productions, and the South is doing the same, but to a much less extent. The Midwest (this is the part I like), however, is the only place where show choir is still traditional and more focused on the singing and dancing, not the theme. In fact, many Midwestern shows don't even have a theme, and if they do, they don't use props and elaborate costumes. If they do, it's very minimal and is still balanced out by the rest of the show. Yes, there are a couple exceptions (I'm talking to you, Prairie), but for the most part, they are still down-to-earth classic show choir shows.
Overall, nationals were really fun and a memorable experience.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)